Gazingstocks?
Q: Are we not counseled not to make
ourselves a gazingstock, to avoid extremes, and that if the world adopts a
proper form of dress, we may adopt it too? Why then, all of this concern about
separation from the world in dress?
A: This statement reads, “Christians should not take pains to make
themselves a gazing-stock by dressing differently from the world. But if, when
following out their convictions of duty in respect to dressing modestly and
healthfully, they find themselves out of fashion, they should not change their
dress in order to be like the world; but they should manifest a noble
independence and moral courage to be right, if all the world differ from them.
If the world introduce a modest, convenient, and healthful mode of dress, which
is in accordance with the Bible, it will not change our relation to God or to
the world to adopt such a style of dress. Christians should follow Christ and
make their dress conform to God's word. They should shun extremes. They should
humbly pursue a straightforward course, irrespective of applause or of censure,
and should cling to the right because of its own merits.” 1T 458, 459.
It is not wrong to wear clothing that has been introduced
by the world, but there is an important condition: that it be “modest,
convenient, and healthful” and “in accordance with the Bible.” As we continue
to study God’s dress principles, we will see that it is very difficult, if not
impossible, to rely on today’s shopping malls for clothing that is in
accordance with God’s principles.
Christians should shun extremes. The context of this statement clarifies what is meant. Our dress should “conform to God’s word” regardless of what others do, and we should “cling to the right because of its own merits.” Modes of dress in harmony with God’s principles are not “extremes.” Extremes would obviously be included in those forms of dress which do not conform to God’s directions.
